The sex trade is a vast and complex economy where people from all walks engage in erotic acts in exchange for money, goods, resources, and services. Policies governing erotic transactions have been historically been crafted through moral outrage. The outcome has been state overreach into the affairs of consenting adults, and the increased endangerment of sex workers. It’s time for a new approach.
In this document we’ll examine four models of sex trade governance, the social narratives that inspire their implementation, and their outcomes. The four models are:
- Full Criminalization
- Partial Criminalization
The sex trade is bad and must be abolished!
Full criminalization is a form of prohibition that seeks to eradicate the sex trade via brute carceral force. Surveillance, sweeps, raids, arrests, and records are the tools of this model of sex trade governance. Criminalization amplifies stigma against the target group, which justifies the detainment and abuse of sex workers and their communities.
Ramifications of full criminalization include…
- Dependence on black markets for commercial interactions.
- Over policing of marginalized communities.
- Lifelong impacts associated with having a criminal record.
- Freezing of financial assets and bank accounts of sex workers.
- Increased vulnerability to violence, coercion, and blackmail.
- Increased isolation of sex workers and social shunning of sex trade clients.
- Inability to safety access emergency services when they are needed.
- Inability for sex workers and clients to communicate terms of service.
- Deterred condoms use, as possession may be used as evidence of a crime.
- Permissible discrimination in all social and institutional sectors.
- Restrictions on freedom of mobility.
This list is inexhaustive. Suppressing the sex trade through a punishment-based model increases the dangers and struggles associated with sex work. Criminalization plays Whack-a-Mole with people’s lives, creating far more problems than it solves. The detrimental impact of a criminal record on a person’s life cannot be overstated.
Prostitutes are victims that must be rescued!
Known as the Nordic model, the Swedish model, or most absurdly the Equality model, partial criminalization is rooted in the opinion that prostitution is a form of gender based violence, and inherently exploitative. Under this model, sex workers are deemed victims in need of saving, and the finger of blame is pointed at the buyer. Under the banner of supply-and-demand economics, policing tactics known as “End Demand” are deployed on the sex trade economy. End Demand tactics vie to deter the purchase of commercial sex by vilifying, arresting and ruining the lives of sex workers’ clients.
Ramifications of partial criminalization include…
- Clients being court ordered to pay for and attend “Johns School”, to be deconditioned away from the desire to purchase sexual services.
- Fragmentation of client’s family units and loss of child custody.
- Loss of jobs, career, social rank, and chances for upward mobility.
- Asset seizure of houses, cars, electronics, and other personal property.
- Risk of being charged with a sex crime and added to a sex offender registry.
- Decreased bargaining power for sex workers over condom use and pricing.
- Economic hardship and increased risk taking amongst sex workers.
- Reduced client pool and increased odds of encountering a violent predator.
- Inability to advertise services online and effectively screen clients for safety.
End Demand is a form of economics siege that’s had catastrophic consequences on sex worker welfare. End Demand also greatly impacts the solidity of families and communities when the arrests of clients are publicized. Unlike other parts of the world, “partial criminalization” in the USA is full criminalization in disguise. Under the Nordic Model in Sweden, sex workers are decriminalized while clients remain vulnerable to arrest. Under End Demand in the USA, sex workers are still arrestable but deprioritized in some circumstances.
Sex work should be regulated like any other industry!
Many people believe that sex work is a form of labor, and that the state shouldn’t interfere with the affairs of consenting adults. People with this perspective are inclined to license, regulate, and tax prostitution under a legalized framework. Due to stigma, legalization in the US carries unique hazards for sex workers. In the USA, we can look to strip clubs and the Nevada brothel system for examples of legalized sex trade governance models.
Unintended consequences of legalization include…
- Creating registries of “known licensed prostitutes” which can lead to lifelong travel restrictions, discrimination, inability to access housing, denial of loans, loss of child custody, mainstream job loss, exclusion from higher education, harassment, stalking, and vulnerability to shifting political landscapes.
- Likelihood that sex workers will be taxed at unfairly high rates.
- Continued over policing of people who cannot participate in the legal frameworks.
- Continued arrest of clients who see sex workers outside of legal frameworks.
- Deterred access to emergency services outside of legal frameworks.
- Decreased ability for sex workers to determine the conditions of their labor.
- Increased class stratification and discrimination in the sex trade.
- Inability for sex workers to operate in their homes.
- Increases state authority to access, surveil, and control sex workers’ bodies.
Legalization is sensible for controlling products such as alcohol or cannabis, but it’s inappropriate for regulating the bodies and sexual practices of consenting adults. Legalization dictates that sex work is only permissable under specific circumstances, and anyone caught outside that framework (whether by choice or necessity) is still considered a criminal.
Sex workers and their clients should be left alone.
The global sex workers rights movement has called from the full decriminalization of prostitution as the best way to protect and respect sex workers and their communities. We can look to New Zealand to measure the impacts of decriminalization, which has been implemented since 2003. Decriminalization removes criminal penalties from consensual adult commercial sex transactions. Regulations related to workplace safety, such as condom use, can be civilly enforced. Crimes such as rape, child exploitation, and assault remain criminally prosecutable under decriminalization.
Benefits of decriminalization include…
- Enables sex workers to dictate their working conditions and prices.
- Enables sex workers to enforce condom use and other safer sex practices.
- Enables sex workers and clients to communicate about services.
- Enables sex workers and clients to access emergency services.
- Enables sex workers to access appropriate health services.
- Allows sex workers to operate together, and decreases isolation.
- Allows sex workers to pay taxes without fear of legal or social consequences.
- Increased ability of law enforcement to correctly identify exploitation.
- Increased ability for victims of violence or exploitation to come forward.
- Prevents predators from being able to effectively target sex workers.
- Maintains that assault, rape, trafficking, and child exploitation remain crimes.
- Decreases stigma against sex workers and their clients.
As our colleagues in New Zealand say, “Less is best” when is comes to governance of the sex trade. Decriminalization allows adults to conduct their consensual affairs and offers access to emergency services where needed. Decriminalization removes sex work from the criminal realm and allows sex workers to report crimes and access basic labor rights. Ultimately, decriminalization yields dignity to sex workers and their clients, and peels back the layers of intense stigma that the industry has accrued over decades of prohibition. Decriminalization has been demanded by the sex workers rights movement, which is global in scope. Instead of governing through knee-jerk reactions to moral outrage and hysteria, it’s time to listen to workers themselves and decriminalize sex work.